Obstetric claims in Finland 2012-2022-A nationwide patient insurance registry study.

INTRODUCTION: Maternal and infant mortality rates in Finland are among the lowest in the world, yet preventable obstetric injuries occur every year. The aim of this study was to describe obstetric claims, their compensation rates, and temporal trends of claims reported to the Patient Insurance Centre. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A nationwide, register-based study was conducted. Data consisted of obstetric claims reported to the Patient Insurance Centre between 2012 and 2022. Data analyzed included the year of injury, compensation criteria, maternal age, birth hospital, delivery method, reported causes of injury, and maternal or neonatal injury. The data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and logistic regression models. RESULTS: A total of n = 849 obstetric claims were filed during the study period, of which n = 224 (26.4%) received compensation. The rate of claims was 0.15%, and the rate of compensation was 0.04% in relation to the total volume of births during the period. Substandard care was the most common (97.3%) criterion for compensation. There was a curvilinear increase in the claims rate and a linear increase in compensation rates from 2013 to 2019. More claims were filed and compensated for cesarean and vacuum-assisted deliveries than for unassisted vaginal deliveries. Delayed delivery (18.7%) and surgical technique failure (10.9%) were the most reported causes of injuries. Retained surgical bodies were the induced cause of injury with the highest rate of compensated claims (86.7%). The most common maternal injury was infection (17.9%) and pain (11.7%). Among neonatal injuries, severe (19.2%) and mild asphyxia (16.6%) were the most frequent. Burn injuries (93.3%) and fetal or neonatal death (60.5%) had the highest rate of compensated claims. CONCLUSIONS: The study provided new information on substandard care and injuries in obstetric care in Finland. An increasing trend in claims and compensation rates was found. Identifying contributors to substandard care that lead to fetal asphyxia is important for improving obstetric safety. Further analysis of the association of claims and compensation rates with operative deliveries is needed to determine their causality. Frequent review of obstetric claims would be useful in providing more recent data on substandard care and preventable injuries.

'Breastfeeding exclusivity, difficulties, and support in the first days after hospital discharge: A correlational study'.

OBJECTIVE: Global breastfeeding rates are not optimal, and the early postpartum period represents a critical time for breastfeeding initiation. The Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative endeavours to provide mothers with evidence-based breastfeeding support in birth hospitals. This study examined factors associated with breastfeeding exclusivity and breastfeeding difficulties in the first days after being discharged from Baby-Friendly designated hospital. The adequacy of breastfeeding support and maternal preferences for optimal support were also reported. STUDY DESIGN: A non-experimental correlational study was conducted between May 2021 and October 2022. A total of n = 80 breastfeeding mothers completed a semi-structured questionnaire within two weeks of discharge from Baby-Friendly hospital in Finland. The questionnaire included demographic and obstetric background information and six questions on breastfeeding exclusivity, breastfeeding difficulties, and breastfeeding support. Descriptive statistical analysis and multivariate binary logistic regression analysis were performed. RESULTS: The mean age of the mothers was 30.6 years (SD 5.4), and half of the mothers were primiparas (49 %). Most mothers gave birth vaginally (85 %) to a full-term infant (84 %). Most (85 %) had made some prenatal plans for breastfeeding, and the median planned duration of breastfeeding was 12 months. Half of the infants (53 %) received supplemental milk while in the hospital. Most mothers (81 %) were exclusively breastfeeding after hospital discharge. Mothers whose infants received supplemental milk in the hospital had an increased odds of non-exclusive breastfeeding (aOR 16.5 [CI 95 % 1.7-156.7], p 0.015). Approximately one-third of the mothers (39 %) experienced breastfeeding difficulties. Primiparous mothers had increased odds of experiencing breastfeeding difficulties (aOR 3.41 [CI 95 % 1.2-9.8], p 0.023). Mothers who received adequate postnatal breastfeeding support in birth hospital had decreased odds of experiencing breastfeeding difficulties (aOR 0.16 [CI 95 % 0.03-0.8], p 0.026). Mothers were mainly satisfied with breastfeeding support, although timelier access to support was preferred after hospital discharge. CONCLUSION: Adequate in-hospital postnatal breastfeeding support, including avoidance of non-medical supplementation, contributes to successful breastfeeding after hospital discharge in terms of more exclusive breastfeeding and fewer breastfeeding difficulties. Primiparous mothers need emphasized support to mitigate breastfeeding difficulties. Timelier access to breastfeeding support after discharge is needed.

Maternal perceptions of breastfeeding support in a birth hospital before and after designation to the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative: A quasi-experimental study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine maternal perceptions of postnatal breastfeeding support in the hospital before and after designation to the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI). Further maternal and infant characteristics associated with the maternal perception of breastfeeding support were investigated. Our hypothesis was that mothers would perceive breastfeeding support more adherent to the standards of the BFHI after the hospital was designated to the BFHI compared with before. DESIGN: The study had a quasi-experimental non-equivalent two-group design. SETTING: The study was conducted in one postnatal ward and one neonatal intensive care unit in a public birth hospital in Finland. PARTICIPANTS: Postpartum mothers giving birth in the hospital before (pre-test group, n = 162) and after (post-test group, n = 163) designation to the BFHI participated. INTERVENTION: The aim of the BFHI is to support and promote breastfeeding by implementing the Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding into routine care. Implementation in the study hospital required staff training and revision of current hospital practices, which took place during 2017-2018. The postnatal ward and neonatal intensive care unit were designated to the Baby-Friendly Hospital in February 2019. MEASUREMENTS: Maternal perceptions of postnatal breastfeeding support were measured with a 20-item questionnaire developed for this study. Items were based on maternal self-report of the breastfeeding support in the hospital. A sum variable was created to measure the maternal perception of the support (scale 1-7), and higher scores indicated perception of breastfeeding support that is more adherent to the standards of the BFHI. Descriptive statics, nonparametric statistical tests, and multiple linear regression analysis were used to analyse data. FINDINGS: Mothers in the post-test group (median 6.1, IQR 5.4-6.4) perceived breastfeeding support more adherent to the standards the BFHI compared with mothers in the pre-test group (median 5.0, IQR 4.2-5.8) (p < 0.001). Fifteen of 20 of the measured breastfeeding support practices improved after the hospital's designation to the BFHI. The largest difference between groups was observed for multipara mothers (median 4.6 vs 6.0, p < 0.001), older mothers (> 35 years) (median 4.4 vs 5.8, p < 0.001), and mothers with a longer history of breastfeeding (6-12 months) (median 4.4 vs 6.2, p < 0.001). Before the BFHI designation, multipara mothers and mothers who gave birth to an infant with low Apgar scores (< 7) perceived breastfeeding support less adherent to the BFHI standards than did primiparas or mothers of an infant with high Apgar scores (≥ 7). After the BFHI designation, mothers who experienced preterm birth (GA < 37 weeks) perceived breastfeeding support less adherent to the BFHI standards compared with mothers who experienced a full-term birth. KEY CONCLUSIONS: Designation to the BFHI had a positive impact on breastfeeding support from the maternal perspective. Designation improved particularly multiparas' perceptions of receiving breastfeeding support that is in adherence with the standards of the BFHI. However, more emphasis should be placed, and further research should be conducted to ensure that mothers giving birth to a preterm infant receive breastfeeding support that is adherent to the BFHI standards. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Birth hospitals are recommended to implement the BFHI as it improves breastfeeding support in the hospital and provides mothers with a good basis and continuation for breastfeeding, even after hospital discharge. Maternal perceptions about the impact of BFHI designation are important to consider because mother - infant dyads are at the centre of that support, and their viewpoint may help to assess whether the designation to the BFHI in the unit is successful. Results of this study indicate that designation to BFHI improves breastfeeding support from the maternal perspective.

Maternal perceptions and experiences of breastfeeding support in Baby-Friendly hospitals: An integrative review.

Background: The Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative aims to improve breastfeeding by implementing the Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding (Ten Steps) into routine breastfeeding support in birth hospitals. Maternal perspective to breastfeeding support is important to consider as mothers and their infants are in the center of that support. Objectives: To review and synthesize the existing literature on maternal perceptions and experiences of breastfeeding support in Baby-Friendly hospitals. A sub-aim was to describe differences in breastfeeding support between Baby-Friendly hospitals and non-Baby-Friendly hospitals from maternal perspective. Data sources and review methods: An integrative literature review. A systematic literature search was conducted in October 2021 in five databases: PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, Scopus, Web of Science. Original peer-reviewed studies published in English exploring maternal viewpoints on breastfeeding support in Baby-Friendly hospitals were included. Two reviewers independently screened the titles (n=914), abstracts (n=226), and full texts (n=47). The review comprised of seventeen studies and includes both quantitative studies (n=14) and qualitative studies (n=3). Inductive content analysis and descriptive synthesis were conducted. Results: Most studies (n=14) measured hospitals' compliance with the Ten Steps practices from maternal perspective. Mothers were provided with breastfeeding information and encouragement, however, a qualitative finding indicated that information focused on positive aspects of breastfeeding. Early skin-to-skin contact between the mother and infant was well facilitated although often not lasting more than 30 min. Breastfeeding was facilitated by practical support but according to findings of two qualitative studies, support was not always adequate to address mothers' problems with breastfeeding. Most mothers were exclusively breastfeeding during the hospital stay and no supplemental milk was offered to infant. Mothers were roomed-in together with their infant and were mostly encouraged to breastfeed on demand. Differences between Baby-Friendly hospitals and non-Baby-Friendly hospitals were observed particularly for steps 6 and 9: supplementary feeding and pacifier use were less common in Baby-Friendly hospitals. Conclusions: From the maternal perspective, breastfeeding support in the Baby-Friendly hospitals was mainly but not completely in adherence with the Ten Steps practices. Low compliance with some of the Ten Steps indicates a need for a more frequent assessment of the breastfeeding support practices and consideration of strategies facilitating a more sustainable implementation of the initiative. Regardless of some shortcomings with the breastfeeding support, mothers were mainly satisfied with the support in the hospital. Mothers in the Baby-Friendly hospitals perceived that breastfeeding support was more adherent to the Ten Steps compared to mothers in non-Baby-Friendly hospitals.